AAS AI Automation Studio / India advisory

For Indian law, audit and accounting firms

Automate the repeatable. Protect the judgement.

AAS builds controlled workflows around the work your firm already does: intake, evidence, drafting, review, chasing and operations. People remain accountable at every material decision.

MarketIndia / mid-market
Starting pointOne workflow
Control modelHuman approval
Control ledger / workflow 01Monitored
01 / InputClient intake
02 / CheckRules + evidence
Control gateHuman review
03 / PrepareDraft output
04 / ReleaseApproved work
Routine pathExceptions remain visible

Where capacity leaks

Growth should not push routine work further up the firm.

The opportunity is practical: remove repetitive preparation and chasing, then make exceptions easier for senior people to see and resolve.

01

Good enquiries cool while teams gather the basics.

Capture the facts, answer routine questions, qualify the opportunity and route it to the right professional before the first response.

Business consequenceSlower conversion and uneven client experience
02

Professionals begin repeatable work from a blank page.

Prepare first drafts, summaries, checklists and evidence schedules from the matter or engagement record, with review built into the route.

Business consequenceSenior time absorbed by low-judgement preparation
03

Chasing is important, but it should not rely on memory.

Track missing documents, unsigned engagements, unpaid invoices, stalled matters and candidate steps, then escalate only what needs attention.

Business consequenceDelay, missed revenue and avoidable operational risk

Selected UK evidence

Proof lives in throughput, exceptions and review time.

These figures come from AAS finance automation work. They show the operating pattern: machines handle volume; people handle the exceptions that matter.

Volume reduced to a reviewable exception set
18,000 → 100

Unknown transactions narrowed to a focused set for human review across a three-year backlog.

Records reconciled
80,000+

Processed overnight for a UK accountancy practice.

Manual cycle
2 days → AM

Two days of work became a morning exceptions review.

Backlog cleared
3 days

For 18,000 previously unreconciled transactions.

Scope from prior work

One control logic, shaped to two professional settings.

Law and accounting work differ in substance. The operational pattern is shared: capture, prepare, review, release, monitor.

Practice map / A

Law firms: from first enquiry to reviewed draft.

Practice map / B

Audit and accounting: from client request to controlled completion.

01

Client intake + triage

Capture enquiries around the clock, answer approved FAQs, filter poor-fit matters and prepare the first letter for review.

02

Lead scoring + routing

Surface value and likelihood-to-win signals, then assign the right lawyer without losing high-value enquiries.

03

Drafting co-pilot

Build legal documents from the case file so fee-earners review and correct rather than begin from scratch.

01

Engagement intake

Capture scope, deadlines, risk indicators and missing documents before the file reaches a manager or partner.

02

Evidence + workpaper chase

Request and track evidence, summarise submissions and escalate overdue items or exceptions for human attention.

03

Reconciliation + close

Match records at scale, orchestrate checklists and present a clean exception queue for professional review.

Shared operating layer Unsigned-client chaseInvoices + remindersComplaints + feedbackRecruitment screening

The next move

Earn the right to scale with one measured workflow.

A controlled pilot creates evidence before commitment. Each stage answers the question required to justify the next.

Choose the bottleneck

Visible volume, delay, cost and a named owner.

Trace the real path

Handoffs, exceptions, templates and controls.

Build one workflow

Approved rules, parallel run and human review from day one.

Test the economics

Time, quality, response speed and confidence.

Extend what works

Scale only when the evidence supports the next move.

The output is a working pilot and a clear go / no-go decision, not a transformation programme built on assumptions.

Evidence before expansion

A focused next step

Give us 30 minutes and one process.

We will identify where automation can remove cost, delay or missed revenue, then define what a controlled first pilot would need to prove.

01Name the process and its owner.
02Estimate volume, time, risk and value.
03Agree controls and success measures.
04Decide with evidence.

Direct enquiry

Send an email to AAS

TO / boris.korol@ai-automation.studio